Apple lays the smack down with Leopard
Posted by Jaymz, October 27th, 2007 in Everything/Nothing, Mac, Slice of Life, Tech, WindowsSo I just got my ass a shiny new Aluminium iMac in time for the great Macfag event that comes once every few years known as the OS upgrade time. While everyone’s writing about the fancy pants Time Machine, or the multiple desktops Spaces offers, or the fact that the Finder kinda sucks a little less than it used to in the past, I thought I’d share my favourite Leopard feature that I’ve come across so far.
So as we all know, Leopard has a new Finder navigation section for shared computers - be it Windows PCs, Macs or things that those smelly neckbeards love to post verbatim about. Sure enough, after jumping in to the Finder for the first time, it picked up my extensive home network (soon to be updated). Wondering what the icon was supposed to represent, I right clicked on the icon for Konata, my trusty fileserver of gargantuan proportions and chose “Get Info”.
Here’s what Leopard gave me.
Oh zing, Apple!
8 Responses to “Apple lays the smack down with Leopard”
- 1 Pingback on Nov 5th, 2007 at 10:32 am
Leave a Reply
Search
About
Hello and welcome to Respect Sakura, yet another shitty blog under the premise of being an animu blog, when it's really just about Jaymz's tech leanings, spending habits and crack-inspired ramblings on topics noone cares about. Oh, and that other guy posts stuff sometimes, too.
Please be warned that this site may contain strong language, adult themes, and sexual discussion about characters that may appear underage but are really over 18, and anything that may look or sound illegal really isn't, you just imagined it because your mind is sick and twisted, and it ain't my fault so don't you dare blame that shit on me son.
ChatBack
Google Friends




Send one my way…
Anyways you know google reader when it reads your blog, all your pictures have your anti leech image…
http://www.respectsakura.org/images/ApplelaysthesmackdownwithLeopard_1842/donegotschooled.png
Kind of amusing, since Windows hasn’t had a BSOD that looks like that since Windows ME, and the newer products have a red screen too.
To be honest, my Macbook has the dreaded dark grey “OH SNAP HOLD IN THE POWER BUTTON TO TURN OF YOUR COMPUTER BECAUSE EVERYTHING JUST WENT TO SHIT” message far more than Vista’s bluescreened on any of my PC’s.
In fact, I haven’t seen Vista bluescreen since the beta. It has hung a couple of times, however.
Brandon wrote:
[img-bandwidth-leeching-faggot]
Ahahahahaha… oops. i’ll add Google to the list of non-naughty sites then. :)
Back before I abandoned MacOS it used to be about as stable as a drunken one-legged 80-year old. Multiple machines, and they always played up, except the ones running System 6 which was like a rock.
Then again, my last Mac was possessed by the devil himself.
Of course the classic Mac OS sucked. When OS 9 was laid to rest, it was one of the most primitive operating systems around.
Let’s summarize it, shall we?
Therefore, I think it’s safe to say we can classify the System series, and OS’s 7.5, 8 and 9 as the worst shit ever to plague mankind since Microsoft BOB and leave it at that.
I was coming on to do my usual PC-fanboy “but bluescreens don’t look like that anymore!” rant, but Negs beat me to it.
Anyway, OS 8/9 may have sucked Jaymz, but you can’t deny Windows had its share of problems too. I mean, the “home” (non-NT/2000) versions of Windows up until Windows XP were all still running on top of DOS, and that caused its fair share of problems. Any old-school PC users who ever tried to run DOS games that required CD-ROM, sound, or network drivers will know what I’m talking about. At least with Mac OS you didn’t have to squeeze all of that into 640kb of base memory.
There were other things that got on my nerves with Windows 95 and 98 too. For example, whenever you changed the IP address, Windows had to reboot. Well, it had to reboot for pretty much anything.
That said, credit where it’s due: Apple had it relatively easy, running Mac OS on a fixed set of hardware. Microsoft had to make Windows run on pretty much any combination of x86 hardware, and despite the flak some people give Windows, that’s not an easy task.